From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birchwood Assoc v. Stern

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 8, 1976
88 Misc. 2d 937 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)

Opinion

November 8, 1976

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, JOSEPH SLAVIN, J.

Katz, Wittenberg, Levine Silverman (Michael S. Harris of counsel), for appellant.

Harold I. Reichel for respondent.


The judgment of the court below (see 86 Misc.2d 607) should be affirmed with $10 costs.

Defendant had vacated her apartment on November 1, 1975, although her lease did not expire until June 30, 1977. Plaintiff having rerented this apartment on February 1, 1976, is entitled to prevail on its cause of action to recover rent for November, 1975 through January, 1976.

The court below, rejecting defendant's contention that plaintiff failed to mitigate damages, held that there is no such duty imposed upon a landlord. This holding is a reiteration of the long-standing rule in New York (Becar v Flues, 64 N.Y. 518; Sancourt Realty Corp. v Dowling, 220 App. Div. 660; Rottkamp v Eger, 74 Misc.2d 858; 2 Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed], § 875). It should be noted, however, that there seems to be a trend whereby the courts have been modernizing traditional concepts of landlord and tenant law (e.g., Tonetti v Penati, 48 A.D.2d 25, 30; 57 E. 54 Realty Corp. v Gay Nineties Realty Corp., 71 Misc.2d 353). Some courts have held that a landlord is obligated to attempt to relet premises where a tenant vacates before the expiration of the lease (Gracie Towne House v Weinstein, NYLJ, March 14, 1973, p 17, col 4; Parkwood Realty Co v Marcano, 77 Misc.2d 690; Sherman Taylor Corp. v Cohen, NYLJ, July 10, 1973, p 10, col 8; see, also, Howard Stores Corp. v Robison Rayon Co., 36 A.D.2d 911). We need not decide whether this rule should be adopted because it is apparent from the papers submitted on the motion for summary judgment that plaintiff diligently attempted to relet the premises.

Concur — SCHWARTZWALD, P.J., PINE and BUSCHMANN, JJ.


Summaries of

Birchwood Assoc v. Stern

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 8, 1976
88 Misc. 2d 937 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)
Case details for

Birchwood Assoc v. Stern

Case Details

Full title:BIRCHWOOD ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. MIRIAM STERN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1976

Citations

88 Misc. 2d 937 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)
390 N.Y.S.2d 505

Citing Cases

Syndicate Building Corp. v. Lorber

We conclude that the trial court erred in relying upon plaintiff's failure to mitigate damages. Although…

Rubin v. Dondysh

In 437 Madison Ave. Assocs. v A.T. Kearney, Inc. ( 120 Misc.2d 944), involving a commercial tenancy, the…