From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birch v. Sattler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 13, 2017
No. 71408 (Nev. Jan. 13, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71408

01-13-2017

BRUCE HARRISON BIRCH, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE ELLIOTT A. SATTLER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This petition appears to seek a writ of mandamus directing respondent to take action to ensure that petitioner is allowed to file documents and/or send letters to respondent. Having reviewed the petition, we are not convinced that petitioner has met his burden of demonstrating that our intervention is warranted at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); see also Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 637 P.2d 534 (1981). We therefore

ORDER the petition DENIED.

The motion for an extension of time is denied.

/s/_________, J.

Douglas /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge

Bruce Harrison Birch

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Birch v. Sattler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 13, 2017
No. 71408 (Nev. Jan. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Birch v. Sattler

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE HARRISON BIRCH, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE ELLIOTT A. SATTLER…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 13, 2017

Citations

No. 71408 (Nev. Jan. 13, 2017)