From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Binns v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 25, 1967
385 F.2d 159 (6th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 17308.

October 25, 1967.

Fyke Farmer, Nashville, Tenn., for appellants.

Stuart A. Smith, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee, Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harold C. Wilkenfeld, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, Gilbert Merritt, Jr., U.S. Atty., Kent Sandidge, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., of counsel.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This is an appeal from the judgment entered in favor of the United States, Defendant-Appellee, in a suit brought in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee by Taxpayer-Appellant to recover income taxes claimed to have been illegally assessed and collected.

The controversy arose out of a sales agreement entered into by Taxpayer, who agreed to sell 26,000 shares of stock of the Phillips and Buttorff Company at $43. per share, of which $75,000. was paid as down payment, and the balance was to be payable a week later. The stock was delivered to the Commerce Union Bank and placed in escrow. Before the end of the week the purchasers of the stock learned they were unable to complete the transaction and agreed to forfeit their down payment of $75,000., as consideration for their being released from further liability under the contract. The Taxpayer agreed to release the purchasers from further liability under the contract and accepted the down payment.

The sole question in the case is whether or not the gain is to be treated as a sale or exchange of a capital asset under Sections 61(a)(3) and 1002 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The Taxpayer contends that the sale was completed when the stock was placed in escrow. The Commissioner determined that the $75,000. which was forfeited, was ordinary income since the sale had not been completed. We agree.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Binns v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 25, 1967
385 F.2d 159 (6th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Binns v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Josephine R. BINNS, Individually, and Josephine R. Binns, Executrix of the…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 25, 1967

Citations

385 F.2d 159 (6th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

United States Freight Co. v. United States

See also, A.M. Johnson, supra; Ralph A. Boatman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 32 T.C. 1188 (1959).…

SUMP v. SCHAULIS

Plaintiffs allege an enterprise to gain or exercise ownership over a piece of land through a series of…