From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bingaman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 23, 2009
285 S.W.3d 831 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED92009.

June 23, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Sandra Martinez, Judge.

Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.



ORDER


Brittany Bingaman ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred when it denied her motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing because her plea counsel was ineffective for affirmatively advising her that she would receive either probation or 120 days pursuant to Section 559.115 RSMo Cum.Supp.2006.

All further statutory references are to RSMo Cum.Supp.2006 unless otherwise indicated.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bingaman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 23, 2009
285 S.W.3d 831 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Bingaman v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brittany BINGAMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 23, 2009

Citations

285 S.W.3d 831 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)