From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bimberg v. Rothenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

June, 1931.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.


Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, and appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The moving papers indicate no defense to the first cause of action. The defenses and counterclaims pertain to the second cause of action only. There is, therefore, no merit in the appeal and the order of severance is correct. Furthermore, appellants were dilatory in perfecting the appeal.


Summaries of

Bimberg v. Rothenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Bimberg v. Rothenfeld

Case Details

Full title:ANNA R. BIMBERG, Respondent, v. OSCAR F. ROTHENFELD and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1931

Citations

233 App. Div. 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)