From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Billman v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Nov 10, 1955
234 Ind. 553 (Ind. 1955)

Opinion

No. 29,303.

Filed November 10, 1955.

EVIDENCE — Verdict Not Sustained by Sufficient Evidence — Vehicle Taking. — When there was evidence that 1950 Chevrolet convertible bearing certain license plates was taken without owner's consent, driven to Marion and there wrecked and evidence also showed appellant drove a 1950 "Chevy convertible" from Indianapolis to Marion, and was involved there in accident, but there was no evidence the two automobiles were the same, the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

From the Marion Criminal Court Division 1, Scott McDonald, Judge.

Guy Billman was found guilty of vehicle taking and he appeals.

Reversed.

Ferdinand Samper, of Indianapolis, for appellant.

Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General, Owen S. Boling, and Stanley B. Miller, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a conviction for vehicle taking. At the close of the State's evidence and again at the close of all the evidence, appellant moved the court for a finding of not guilty for the reason that "The State has failed to prove the allegation of this complaint."

The grounds for a new trial were (1) the overruling of said motion for a directed verdict, and (2) "that the finding (verdict) . . . is contrary to law."

There is evidence that the "1950 Chevrolet convertible" automobile, license number A W 7314, owned by the prosecuting witness, was driven to Marion, Indiana from Indianapolis without his consent and was there wrecked. There is also evidence that the appellant drove a "1950 Chevy convertible" to Marion from Indianapolis with which he "was involved in an accident and arrested by the Marion police." However, there is no evidence that these "1950 Chevy convertible(s)" were the same automobile.

The finding (verdict) is therefore not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law. Flanagan, Wiltrout Hamilton's Indiana Trial and Appellate Practice, § 1812, Comment 6, p. 386.

Judgment reversed with instructions to sustain appellant's motion for new trial.

Emmert, C.J., Arterburn, Bobbitt and Landis, JJ., concur.

NOTE. — Reported in 129 N.E.2d 795.


Summaries of

Billman v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Nov 10, 1955
234 Ind. 553 (Ind. 1955)
Case details for

Billman v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILLMAN v. STATE OF INDIANA

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Nov 10, 1955

Citations

234 Ind. 553 (Ind. 1955)
129 N.E.2d 795

Citing Cases

Carey v. Carey

It is the law in Indiana under the decisions of the Supreme Court and our court that a decision against one…

Arnold v. State

The cases cited by the appellant may be readily distinguished by the facts here presented. Shelby v. State…