From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biletnikoff v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 24, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-00208-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cv-00208-LJO-SKO

04-24-2013

CYNTHIA BILETNIKOFF, an individual Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant.

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP STEPHEN J. NEWMAN BRIAN C. FRONTINO ARJUN P. RAO Arjun P. Rao Attorneys for Defendant CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. RONALD WILCOX, ATTORNEY AT LAW And ANDRE VERDUN, CROWLEY LAW GROUP Ronald Wilcox Attorneys for Plaintiff CYNTHIA BILETNIKOFF


STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
STEPHEN J. NEWMAN (State Bar No. 181570)
BRIAN C. FRONTINO (State Bar No. 222032)
ARJUN P. RAO (State Bar No. 265347)
2029 Century Park East, Suite 1600
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086
Telephone: 310-556-5800
Facsimile: 310-556-5959
Email: lacalendar@stroock.com
Attorneys for Defendant
CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued
as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR LEAVE

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

AND WITHDRAWING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE MOTION OF DEFENDANT

CHASE BANK USA, N.A. TO DISMISS

THE COMPLAINT


[EASTERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 143]


Action Removed: February 8, 2013

WHEREAS, on March 1, 2013, Chase, filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Strike Allegations in the Complaint (the "Motion");

WHEREAS, on April 17, 2013 plaintiff Cynthia Biletnikoff ("Plaintiff") filed her Opposition to the Motion;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Chase, through their respective counsel of record, have discussed the Motion and, in an effort to conserve judicial resources, agreed that Plaintiff will file a First Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, upon Plaintiff's filing a First Amended Complaint, the Motion will become moot; and

WHEREAS, Chase expressly does not concede that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, which Chase has not seen, resolves the issues raised in the Motion and, accordingly, Chase expressly reserves its right to challenge the First Amended Complaint.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Chase, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff will file a First Amended Complaint on or before May 3, 2013, and Chase's responsive pleading thereto will be filed on or before May 23, 2013.

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

STEPHEN J. NEWMAN

BRIAN C. FRONTINO

ARJUN P. RAO

By: __________

Arjun P. Rao

Attorneys for Defendant

CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued

as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

RONALD WILCOX, ATTORNEY AT LAW

And ANDRE VERDUN, CROWLEY LAW

GROUP

By: Ronald Wilcox

(as approved on April 24, 2013)

Ronald Wilcox

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CYNTHIA BILETNIKOFF

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Motion of defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A., erroneously sued as JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Strike Allegations in the Complaint is withdrawn without prejudice. As such, this Court

1. ORDERS plaintiff, no later than May 3, 2013, to file and serve her First Amended Complaint; and
2. ORDERS defendant, no later than May 23, 2013, to file a response thereto.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Biletnikoff v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 24, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-00208-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Biletnikoff v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA BILETNIKOFF, an individual Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cv-00208-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2013)