From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biletnikoff v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-00208-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cv-00208-LJO-SKO

03-27-2013

CYNTHIA BILETNIKOFF, an individual Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant.

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP STEPHEN J. NEWMAN BRIAN C. FRONTINO ARJUN P. RAO Arjun P. Rao Attorneys for Defendant CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. RONALD WILCOX, ATTORNEY AT LAW And CROWLEY LAW GROUP (as approved on March 26, 2013) Ronald Wilcox Attorneys for Plaintiff CYNTHIA BILETNIKOFF


STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
STEPHEN J. NEWMAN (State Bar No. 181570)
BRIAN C. FRONTINO (State Bar No. 222032)
ARJUN P. RAO (State Bar No. 265347)
2029 Century Park East, Suite 1600
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086
Telephone: 310-556-5800
Facsimile: 310-556-5959
Email: lacalendar@stroock.com
Attorneys for Defendant
CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued
as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION

OF DEFENDANT TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT


[EASTERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 230]


REVISED COURT ORDER

Action Removed: February 8, 2013

WHEREAS, on March 1, 2013, defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A., erroneously sued as JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Strike Allegations in the Complaint ("Motion");

WHEREAS, the Motion currently is set for hearing on April 17, 2013;

WHEREAS, counsel for plaintiff Cynthia Biletnikoff ("Plaintiff") has requested a two (2) week continuance of the hearing date to accommodate counsel's calendar; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Chase, through their respective counsel of record, have agreed to continue the hearing on the Motion to May 1, 2013 and the corresponding briefing schedule shall be by Local Rule 230.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Chase, through their respective counsel of record, that the hearing on the Motion, as well as the briefing schedule, shall be continued to May 1, 2013 and the corresponding opposition and reply deadlines shall accordingly be extended pursuant to Local Rule 230 based on the continued Motion hearing date.

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

STEPHEN J. NEWMAN

BRIAN C. FRONTINO

ARJUN P. RAO

By: _________

Arjun P. Rao

Attorneys for Defendant

CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued

as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

RONALD WILCOX, ATTORNEY AT LAW

And CROWLEY LAW GROUP

By:

(as approved on March 26, 2013)

Ronald Wilcox

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CYNTHIA BILETNIKOFF

ORDER

This Court's practice is to consider motions without a hearing. As such and based on the parties' stipulation, this Court:

1. VACATES the April 17, 2013 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss;
2. ORDERS plaintiff, no later than April 17, 2013, to file and serve papers either: (a) to oppose the motion to dismiss; or (b) to dismiss this action; and
3. ORDERS defendant, no later than April 24, 2013, to file and serve optional reply papers, as necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Biletnikoff v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-00208-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Biletnikoff v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA BILETNIKOFF, an individual Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cv-00208-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)