Bigford Enterprises, Inc. v. D.C. Development, Inc.

Full title: Bigford Enterprises, Inc., Bishop & Associates, Inc. d/b/a bishop= brick…

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 1, 2015

2015-UP-330 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 1, 2015)

Opinion

2015-UP-330

07-01-2015

Bigford Enterprises, Inc., Bishop & Associates, Inc. d/b/a bishop= brick= mcbride= building= supplies= v.= inc.= d.c.= development= llc= by= way= articles= of= conversion= and= david= respondents.= appellate= case= no.=

Aimee Victoria-Ann Leary and Wendell Leon Hawkins, both of Wendell L. Hawkins, PA, of Greer, for Appellants. William E. Booth, III, of Booth Law Firm, LLC, of West Columbia, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted April 1, 2015

Appeal From Horry County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge

Aimee Victoria-Ann Leary and Wendell Leon Hawkins, both of Wendell L. Hawkins, PA, of Greer, for Appellants.

William E. Booth, III, of Booth Law Firm, LLC, of West Columbia, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Dumas v. InfoSafe Corp., 320 S.C. 188, 192, 463 S.E.2d 641, 643 (Ct. App. 1995) ("An action to pierce the corporate veil is one in equity."); Dixon v. Dixon, 362 S.C. 388, 400, 608 S.E.2d 849, 855 (2005) ("This [c]ourt has held that the statute of limitations does not apply to actions in equity.").^[1]

[1] We do not read

REVERSED AND REMANDED. ^[2]

[2] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

SHORT, LOCKEMY, and McDONALD, JJ., concur. Carolina Marine Handling, Inc. v. Lasch, 363 S.C. 169, 609 S.E.2d 548 (Ct. App. 2005), as creating a statute of limitations for actions to pierce the corporate veil.