From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biesenthal v. Wise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1906
112 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

March, 1906.

Present — O'Brien, P.J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ.


The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the 2d provision thereof, providing that the payment of the seventy-five dollars specified shall be in full for all services rendered in the action, and substituting in place thereof a provision that appellants Kronfeld and Harris be permitted to receive the seventy-five dollars directed to be paid without prejudice to the bringing of any action by them against the defendant Wise to recover further compensation for the services rendered to him, if they shall be so advised. As so modified the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party.


Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order filed.


Summaries of

Biesenthal v. Wise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1906
112 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Biesenthal v. Wise

Case Details

Full title:Isaac C. Biesenthal, Plaintiff, v. Benjamin Wise, Defendant. In the Matter…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1906

Citations

112 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)