From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bickham v. Reprosource Fertility Servs.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Jul 25, 2024
1:21-cv-11879-GAO (D. Mass. Jul. 25, 2024)

Opinion

1:21-cv-11879-GAO

07-25-2024

JASMYN BICKHAM, AMANDA BAILEY, AND LISA GORDON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. REPROSOURCE FERTILITY DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Honorable George A. O'Toole, Jr., Judge.

The Court, having held a Final Approval Hearing on July 17, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., in the Courtroom of The Honorable George A. O'Toole, Jr., United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1 Courthouse Way, Boston, Massachusetts, before Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson, and having considered all matters submitted to it at the Final Approval Hearing and otherwise, and finding no just reason for delay in entry of this Final Approval Order (the “Order”) and good cause appearing therefor, and having considered the papers filed and proceedings held in connection with the Settlement, having considered all of the other files, records, and proceedings in the Action, and being otherwise fully advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and all matters relating to the Settlement, as well as personal jurisdiction over all of the Parties and each of the Class Members. Venue is proper in this Court.

2. This Order incorporates and makes a part hereof: (a) the Class Action Settlement Agreement, fully executed as of January 10, 2024 (“Settlement Agreement”), including the definitions in the Settlement Agreement and (b) the Notices attached as Exhibits thereto, respectively, all of which were filed with the Court on January 10, 2024. All capitalized terms used in this Order have the same meaning as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.

3. Certification of the Settlement Class for Purposes of Settlement. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court certifies, solely for purposes of effectuating the Settlement, this Action as a class action on behalf of the Settlement Class defined as: “all natural persons whose Personal Information was compromised in the Security Incident and to whom ReproSource sent written notice of the Security Incident in or around October 2021.” Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (1) the Judges presiding over the Action and members of their families; (2) ReproSource, its subsidiaries, parent companies, successors, predecessors, and any entity in which ReproSource or its parents, have a controlling interest, and its current or former officers and directors; (3) natural persons who properly execute and submit a request for exclusion prior to the expiration of the Opt-Out Period; and (4) the successors or assigns of any such excluded natural person.

4. Class Representative. Plaintiffs Jasmyn Bickham, Amanda Bailey, and Lisa Gordon (“Class Representatives”) are hereby appointed, for settlement purposes only, as representatives for the Settlement Class for purposes of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

5. Class Counsel. Migliaccio & Rathod LLP, Pastor Law Office PC, Kind Law, and Freedom Law Firm are hereby appointed, for settlement purposes only, as counsel for the Settlement Class pursuant to Rules 23(c)(1)(B) and (g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

6. Class Notice. The Court finds that the dissemination of Notice to Settlement Class Members: (a) was implemented in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order; (b) constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances; (c) constituted notice that was reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Class members of (i) the pendency of the Action; (ii) their right to submit a claim (where applicable) by submitting a Claim Form; (iii) their right to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class; (iv) the effect of the proposed Settlement (including the releases to be provided thereunder); (v) Class Counsel's motion for an Award of Fees and Costs and for Service Awards to the Class Representatives; (vi) their right to object to any aspect of the Settlement, and/or Class Counsel's motion for Service Awards to the Class Representatives and for a Fee and Cost Award; and (vii) their right to appear at the Final Approval Hearing; (viii) constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all natural persons entitled to receive notice of the proposed Settlement; and (ix) satisfied the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Constitution of the United States (including the Due Process Clause), and all other applicable laws and rules.

7. Class Action Fairness Act Notice. The notice to government officials, as given, complied with 28 U.S.C. § 1715.

8. Objections. Pursuant to Rule 23(e)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Class Members had the opportunity to file objections. The deadline for submitting objections has passed and none have been filed.

9. Final Settlement Approval and Dismissal of Claims. Pursuant to, and in accordance with, Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby fully and finally approves the Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement in all respects (including, without limitation: the consideration provided for in the Settlement; the releases provided for therein; and the dismissal with prejudice of the claims asserted against Defendant in the Action), and finds that the Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class. The Court finds that, pursuant to Rule 23(e)(2), (A) the Class Representative and Class Counsel have adequately represented the Settlement Class; (B) the Settlement was negotiated at arm's length; (C) the relief provided for the Settlement Class is fair, reasonable, and adequate taking into account: (i) the costs, risks, and delay of trial and appeal; (ii) the effectiveness of the proposed method of distributing relief to the Settlement Class, including the method of processing Class Member claims; (iii) the terms of the proposed award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of costs and other expenses, as well as the Service Awards to the Class Representatives; and (iv) any agreement required to be identified under Rule 23(e)(3); and (D) the Settlement treats Class Members equitably relative to each other. The Parties are directed to implement, perform, and consummate the Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions contained in the Settlement Agreement.

10. Dismissal with Prejudice. The Action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Parties shall bear their own costs and expenses, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Settlement Agreement and in this Order.

11. Binding Effect. The terms of the Settlement Agreement and of this Order shall be forever binding on Defendant, Plaintiffs, and all Class Members (regardless of whether or not any individual Class Member submits a Claim Form, seeks or obtains a Settlement benefit, or has objected to the Settlement), as well as their respective successors and assigns.

12. Opt Outs. A total of seventeen individuals submitted timely and proper Requests for Exclusion. They are therefore excluded from the Settlement Class and are not bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement or this Order.

13. Releases. The releases set forth in Section 4 of the Settlement Agreement are expressly incorporated herein in all respects. The releases are effective as of the Effective Date. Accordingly, this Court orders pursuant to this Order, without further action by anyone, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, and as provided in the Settlement Agreement, that Plaintiffs and each and every member of the Settlement Class (except the seventeen (17) individuals who have opted out of this settlement) shall have released the Released Claims against the Released Parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Order shall bar any action by any of the Parties to enforce or effectuate the terms of the Settlement Agreement or this Order.

14. Future Prosecutions Barred. Plaintiffs and all Class Members are hereby barred and permanently enjoined from instituting, asserting, or prosecuting any or all of the Released Claims against any of the Released Parties.

15. No Admission of Liability. The Court hereby decrees that the Settlement, this Order, and the fact of the Settlement do not constitute admissions or concessions by Defendant or any of the Released Parties of any fault, wrongdoing, or liability whatsoever, or an admission of the appropriateness of class certification for trial or dispositive motion practice. This Order is not a finding of the validity or invalidity of any of the claims asserted or defenses raised in the Action. Nothing relating to the Settlement shall be offered or received in evidence as an admission, concession, presumption or inference against Defendant or any of the Released Parties in any proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to consummate or enforce the Settlement Agreement or to support a defense based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense.

16. Attorneys' Fees and Expenses. Class Counsel are awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $416,666.67, and reimbursement of costs and expenses in the amount of $16,229.31, and such amounts shall be paid by the Settlement Administrator pursuant to and consistent with the terms of the Settlement.

17. Service Awards. The Class Representatives are awarded Service Awards in the amount of $2,500 each (for a total of $7,500), and such amounts shall be paid by the Settlement Administrator pursuant to and consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

18. Modification of the Settlement Agreement. Without further approval from the Court, Plaintiffs, by and through Class Counsel, and Defendant are hereby authorized to agree to and adopt such amendments or modifications of the Settlement Agreement or any exhibits attached thereto to effectuate the Settlement that: (a) are not materially inconsistent with this Order; and (b) do not materially limit the rights of members of the Settlement Class in connection with the Settlement. Without further order of the Court, Plaintiff, by and through Class Counsel, and Defendant may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement.

19. Retention of Jurisdiction. Without affecting the finality of this Order in any way, the Court hereby retains and reserves jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of this Settlement and any distributions pursuant to the Settlement; (b) the Action, until the Effective Date and until each and every act agreed to be performed by the Parties shall have been performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, including the exhibits appended thereto; and (c) all Parties, for the purpose of interpreting, implementing, and enforcing the settlement embodied in the Settlement Agreement.

20. Termination of Settlement. If the Settlement is terminated as provided in the Settlement Agreement or the Effective Date of the Settlement otherwise fails to occur, this Order shall be vacated, rendered null and void and be of no further force and effect, except as otherwise provided by the Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall be without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiffs, Class Members, and Defendant, and the Parties shall be deemed to have reverted nunc pro tunc to their respective litigation positions in the Action immediately prior to the execution of the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.


Summaries of

Bickham v. Reprosource Fertility Servs.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Jul 25, 2024
1:21-cv-11879-GAO (D. Mass. Jul. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Bickham v. Reprosource Fertility Servs.

Case Details

Full title:JASMYN BICKHAM, AMANDA BAILEY, AND LISA GORDON, individually and on behalf…

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Jul 25, 2024

Citations

1:21-cv-11879-GAO (D. Mass. Jul. 25, 2024)