From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 8, 2013
498 F. App'x 998 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2012-1387

02-08-2013

BIAX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NVIDIA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. AND SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC., AND SONY ELECTRONICS INC., Defendants-Appellees.

STEVEN J. MERKER, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC argued for defendant-appellee, Nvidia Corporation and DAVID ROKACH, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees, Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., et al. With them on the brief were CHRIS R. OTTENWELLER, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, ALEX V. CHACHKES, of New York, New York, DONALD DAYBELL and CHRISTINA VON DER AHE, of Irvine, California for defendant-appellee, Nvidia Corporation. Also on the brief was CHRISTIAN CHADD TAYLOR, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, for all defendants-appellees. Of counsel was INDRA NEEL CHATTERJEE, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, for defendant-appellee, Nvida Corporation.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 09-CV-1257, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

JUDGMENT

STEVEN J. MERKER, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC argued for defendant-appellee, Nvidia Corporation and DAVID ROKACH, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees, Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., et al. With them on the brief were CHRIS R. OTTENWELLER, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, ALEX V. CHACHKES, of New York, New York, DONALD DAYBELL and CHRISTINA VON DER AHE, of Irvine, California for defendant-appellee, Nvidia Corporation. Also on the brief was CHRISTIAN CHADD TAYLOR, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, for all defendants-appellees. Of counsel was INDRA NEEL CHATTERJEE, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, for defendant-appellee, Nvida Corporation. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_____________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 8, 2013
498 F. App'x 998 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BIAX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NVIDIA CORPORATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

498 F. App'x 998 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.

This court affirmed without opinion. Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp., 498 F. App'x 998 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Biax…