From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bhambra v. Illston

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 1, 2023
23-cv-00157-VC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-00157-VC

02-01-2023

HARJIT BHAMBRA, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN YVONNE ILLSTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Re: Dkt. No. 1

VINCE CHHABRIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The complaint is obviously frivolous, and so it is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83, 89 (1998); Arnold v. United States, No. 19-CV-05147-SVK, 2020 WL 732995, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2020).

Dismissal is without leave to amend. Bonin v. Calderon, 59 F.3d 815, 845 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Futility of amendment can, by itself, justify the denial of a motion for leave to amend.”). No further filings from Bhambra will be considered; if he disagrees with this ruling, he may appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bhambra v. Illston

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 1, 2023
23-cv-00157-VC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Bhambra v. Illston

Case Details

Full title:HARJIT BHAMBRA, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN YVONNE ILLSTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 1, 2023

Citations

23-cv-00157-VC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)