Summary
dismissing case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) where plaintiff was missing for approximately eight months and failed to attend two conferences
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. ClarkOpinion
03-CV-6051 (DRH)(JO).
April 26, 2005
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
On April 6, 2005, United States Magistrate Judge James Orenstein issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court enter an order dismissing Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
The Report advised the parties that any party must file objections within ten (10) days of service of the report, and that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal the final order of this Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). More than ten (10) days have elapsed since the Report was served and to date, no party has filed any objections.
The Court has reviewed the conclusions reached by Judge Orenstein and finds that they are supported in the record and not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court adopts the April 6, 2005 Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED.