From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beylund v. Gomez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 9, 1986
498 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-2122.

December 9, 1986.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; David L. Levy, Judge.

Blackwell, Walker, Fascell Hoehl and William N. Charouhis, Miami, for appellant.

Bernard I. Rappaport, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.


Appellant served letters on appellee's counsel in response to the complaint, thereby triggering the notice provision of Florida Rule Civil Procedure 1.500(b); appellee, however, failed to provide appellant with the required notice. J.A.R., Inc. v. Universal American Realty Corp., 485 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 462 So.2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Terino Bros., Inc. v. Airey, 364 So.2d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Consequently, we reverse the Order Denying Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Beylund v. Gomez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 9, 1986
498 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Beylund v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BEYLUND, APPELLANT, v. BALTASAR GOMEZ, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 9, 1986

Citations

498 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Crocker Inv. v. Statesman L. Ins. Co.

A timely letter served by a defendant to a plaintiff constitutes a paper served within the meaning of Rule…

Appliance Ref. Distrib. v. Fedders

Pursuant to Rule 1.500(b), Fla.R.Civ.P., if a party has filed or served any paper in an action, then that…