From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bey v. Wells

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 22, 2023
22-cv-00411-WHO (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-00411-WHO

02-22-2023

JAMIL MALIK BEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTINA WELLS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The parties to the action have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement. Dkt. No. 66. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bey v. Wells

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 22, 2023
22-cv-00411-WHO (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Bey v. Wells

Case Details

Full title:JAMIL MALIK BEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTINA WELLS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 22, 2023

Citations

22-cv-00411-WHO (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)