From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bey v. Szabad

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2024
4:24-cv-183-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-183-DPM

12-10-2024

ALI ALI BEY, PLAINTIFF v. RICHARD SZABAD and TRE DAVIS, Patrol Person, DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge

Bey's motion to add the Bryant Police Department and its Chief Carl Minden as defendants, Doc. 17, denied. As previously ruled, the Bryant Police Department is not an entity that can be sued under § 1983, Doc. 5. Ketchum v. City of West Memphis, Arkansas, 974 F.2d 81, 82 (8th Cir. 1992). Bey hasn't pleaded facts showing Chief Minden was personally involved. He hasn't pleaded any facts, other than this incident, to show a plausible claim for failure to train. That event standing alone is not enough. And he hasn't pleaded facts showing an unconstitutional custom or practice. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Bey v. Szabad

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2024
4:24-cv-183-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Bey v. Szabad

Case Details

Full title:ALI ALI BEY, PLAINTIFF v. RICHARD SZABAD and TRE DAVIS, Patrol Person…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 10, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-183-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)