From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bey v. City of Glendale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 17, 2015
Case No. CV 13-1567-DMG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-1567-DMG (SP)

12-17-2015

DAVID THOMPSON BOYD BEY, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GLENDALE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, other records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. // // //

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Judgment will be entered dismissing the Third Amended Complaint and this action with prejudice. DATED: December 17, 2015

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bey v. City of Glendale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 17, 2015
Case No. CV 13-1567-DMG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Bey v. City of Glendale

Case Details

Full title:DAVID THOMPSON BOYD BEY, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GLENDALE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 17, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-1567-DMG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2015)