From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bevill v. Schutte

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Oct 12, 2015
362 P.3d 805 (Haw. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. CAAP–14–0000778.

10-12-2015

Spencer James BEVILL, Nancy Lynn Bevill, and Bevill Family Trust, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants/Appellants, v. Phil SCHUTTE ; Beverly Schutte; Bruce "Skip" Blough; Mike Preiss; Connie Schnitker; Pete Hill ; Darrel Borling; Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai, an incorporated condominium association; the Board of Directors for Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai, in their official capacity and personally, Defendants/Appellees, Frank Maurizio, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff/Appellee, John Does 1–100, Jane Does 1–100, Doe Partnerships 1–100, and Doe Corporations 1–100, Defendants (Civil No. 08–1–0293(1)) Spencer James Bevill, Nancy Lynn Bevill, and Bevill Family Trust, Plaintiffs/Appellants v. Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai, Defendant/Third–Party Plaintiff/Appellee, Alan Brayton, Defendant/Third–Party Defendant/Appellee, John Does 1–100, Jane Does 1–100, Doe Partnerships 1–100 and Doe Corporations 1–100, Defendants (Civil No. 12–1–0790(1)).

Terrance M. Revere, Lauren C. McDowell (Revere & Associates), on the briefs, for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants/Appellants/Cross–Appellees. Myles T. Yamamoto, Carol A.L. Rosenberg, Na Lan (Motooka & Yamamoto), on the briefs, for Third–Party in Interest/Appellee/Cross–Appellant. Rebecca A. Copeland, on the briefs, for Real Party in Interest/Appellee/Cross–Appellant Myles T. Yamamoto.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Vacated and Remanded.


Summaries of

Bevill v. Schutte

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Oct 12, 2015
362 P.3d 805 (Haw. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Bevill v. Schutte

Case Details

Full title:Spencer James BEVILL, Nancy Lynn Bevill, and Bevill Family Trust…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.

Date published: Oct 12, 2015

Citations

362 P.3d 805 (Haw. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Millsap

As a result, on these facts, we conclude that the order cancelling the charging lien does not fall within the…