From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bevan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 15, 1973
472 F.2d 1381 (6th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 72-1748.

Argued and Submitted February 9, 1973.

Decided February 15, 1973.

Walter E. Bevan, pro se.

Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Thomas L. Stapleton, Dennis M. Donohue, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Lee H. Henkel, Jr., Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Before WEICK, MILLER and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A decision of the United States Tax Court determined income tax deficiencies for the years 1962, 1963 and 1964 and the taxpayers have appealed. The taxpayers did not keep a formal set of books in the operation of their business and the bank deposit method was used in reconstructing income. The amount determined as deficiency for the three years by the United States Tax Court was less than that asserted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

This Court has carefully examined the record and briefs and considered the arguments made in this case and has determined that the findings of the United States Tax Court are not clearly erroneous. See Opinion in 30 T.C.M. 1337 (1971).

The decision of the United States Tax Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Bevan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 15, 1973
472 F.2d 1381 (6th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

Bevan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:WALTER E. BEVAN AND IRENE BEVAN, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v. COMMISSIONER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 15, 1973

Citations

472 F.2d 1381 (6th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

In re Callery

The bank deposit method may be used in reconstructing a taxpayer's income and has in fact received consistent…