From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beth v. Credence Res. Mgmt.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 22, 2022
2:22-cv-08033-CAS-MARx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-08033-CAS-MARx

12-22-2022

BRIAN J. BETH, Plaintiff, v. CREDENCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, LLC., Defendant.

SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD.


SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD.

DISMISSAL AND ORDER

Plaintiff, BRIAN J. BETH (“Plaintiff”), by and through the undersigned attorney, having filed with this Court his Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice and the Court having reviewed same, now finds that this matter should be dismissed as to Defendant, CREDENCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, LLC.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by this Court that the above cause of action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, as to CREDENCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, LLC. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees.


Summaries of

Beth v. Credence Res. Mgmt.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 22, 2022
2:22-cv-08033-CAS-MARx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Beth v. Credence Res. Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN J. BETH, Plaintiff, v. CREDENCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, LLC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 22, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-08033-CAS-MARx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2022)