Opinion
Civil Action 3:19-CV-1599
02-02-2022
RONALD BEST, Plaintiff, v. S.C.I. HUNTINGDON, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
ROBERT D. MARIANI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS 2 nd DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022, upon consideration of the “Pro se Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment for Attorney” (Doc. 17) filed by Plaintiff Ronald Best, because the above-captioned civil matter was closed on February 4, 2020, (Doc. 16), no additional matters are pending before the Court, and Plaintiff is requesting an attorney only to review his case (id. at 1), the Court has no basis upon which to conclude that Plaintiff is entitled to the appointment of counsel, see, e.g., Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294 F.3d 492, 499 (3d Cir. 2002); Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 155-57 (3d Cir. 1993), AND ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. 17) is DENIED.