Opinion
06-22-2016
In the Matter of Hilary BEST, petitioner, v. Barry A. SCHWARTZ, etc., et al., respondents.
Hilary Best, Forest Hills, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent Barry A. Schwartz. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Danielle M. O'Boyle of counsel), respondent pro se.
Hilary Best, Forest Hills, N.Y., petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent Barry A. Schwartz.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Danielle M. O'Boyle of counsel), respondent pro se.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the prosecution of the petitioner in a criminal action entitled People v. Best, commenced in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Indictment No. 768/14, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569, 528 N.Y.S.2d 21, 523 N.E.2d 297 ; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352, 509 N.Y.S.2d 493, 502 N.E.2d 170 ). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.
LEVENTHAL, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and BARROS, JJ., concur.