Best v. Mobile Streams, Inc.

Full title: BLAKE BEST, Plaintiff, v. MOBILE STREAMS, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Case No. 1:12-cv-564 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-564

03-12-2013

BLAKE BEST, Plaintiff, v. MOBILE STREAMS, INC., et al., Defendants.

Karen L. Litkovitz

Barrett, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

ORDER

There are currently a number of pending motions before the Court related to plaintiff's first amended complaint. As the undersigned has granted plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint, see Doc. 93, all motions pertaining to the first amended complaint are denied as moot. Specifically, the following motions:

(1) plaintiff's motion to reissue summons (Doc. 13);
(2) plaintiff's motion to extend time for service (Doc. 16);
(3) plaintiff's amended motion to extend time for service (Doc. 23);
(4) plaintiff's second amended motion to extend time for service (Doc. 27);
(5) plaintiff's motion for default (Doc. 53);
(6) defendant Funmobile, Ltd.'s motion to strike plaintiff's motion for default (Doc. 54);
(7) defendant Mobilefunster, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (Doc. 57);
(8) defendant Funmobile, Ltd.'s motion to dismiss (Doc. 59);
(9) plaintiff's motion to file a supplemental memorandum in opposition to Funmobile Ltd.'s motion to dismiss (Doc. 69);
(10) plaintiff's motion to dismiss Mobilefunster, Inc's counterclaims (Doc. 74); and
(11) plaintiff's motion to strike Mobilefunster, Inc.'s affirmative defenses (Doc. 75)

are denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge