From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Best v. Mobile Streams, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-564 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-564

01-23-2013

BLAKE BEST, Plaintiff, v. MOBILE STREAMS, INC., et al., Defendants.


Barrett, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court following a telephone status conference held on January 23, 2013 before the undersigned magistrate judge. As discussed in the conference, plaintiff has not obtained counsel and will be proceeding pro se in prosecuting this lawsuit. Consequently, the Court sets the following briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint (Doc. 62). Defendants shall file responses to plaintiff's motion on or before February 6, 2013; plaintiff has until February 20, 2013 to file a reply. Any other responsive or reply briefs regarding other motions currently before the Court are stayed pending this Court's ruling on plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Best v. Mobile Streams, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-564 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Best v. Mobile Streams, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BLAKE BEST, Plaintiff, v. MOBILE STREAMS, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-564 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)