From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Harrison

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Mar 6, 2013
393 S.W.3d 780 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013)

Summary

concluding that the lab technician's actions were unreliable because he had not followed accepted standards when analyzing the evidence, which resulted in a due process violation

Summary of this case from Diamond v. State

Opinion

No. AP–76,980.

2013-03-6

Ex parte Patrick Lynn HOBBS, Applicant.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. 09CR1300, in the 122nd District Court from Galveston County; John Ellisor, Judge. Jeffrey Gelb, Galveston, TX, for Appellant. Jack Roady, Galveston, TX, District Attorney, Galveston County, Lisa C. McMinn, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.


On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. 09CR1300, in the 122nd District Court from Galveston County; John Ellisor, Judge.
Jeffrey Gelb, Galveston, TX, for Appellant. Jack Roady, Galveston, TX, District Attorney, Galveston County, Lisa C. McMinn, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.

OPINION


PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App.1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to eight years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his due process rights were violated because a forensic scientist did not follow accepted standards when analyzing evidence and therefore the results of his analyses are unreliable. A Department of Public Safety report shows that the lab technician who was solely responsible for testing the evidence in this case is the scientist found to have committed misconduct. While there is evidence remaining that is available to retest in this case, that evidence was in the custody of the lab technician in question. This Court believes his actions are not reliable; therefore custody was compromised, resulting in a due process violation. Applicant is therefore entitled to relief.

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 09CR1300 in the 122nd District Court of Galveston County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Galveston County. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.


Summaries of

Ex parte Harrison

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Mar 6, 2013
393 S.W.3d 780 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013)

concluding that the lab technician's actions were unreliable because he had not followed accepted standards when analyzing the evidence, which resulted in a due process violation

Summary of this case from Diamond v. State

concluding that the lab technician's actions were unreliable because he had not followed accepted standards when analyzing the evidence, which resulted in a due process violation

Summary of this case from Diamond v. State
Case details for

Ex parte Harrison

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE CRAIG RONALD HARRISON, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

393 S.W.3d 780 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Ex parte Owens

Originally, after Salvador's misconduct came to light, this Court granted relief in several cases on the…

Ex parte Coty

We then issued our second published opinion dealing with this issue and granted the applicant relief,…