From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bertrand v. Lane County Assessor

Tax Court of Oregon
Jun 24, 2013
TC-MD 130131N (Or. T.C. Jun. 24, 2013)

Opinion

TC-MD 130131N

06-24-2013

ANAHID BERTRAND and ERIC ANDRE PAUL BERTRAND, Plaintiffs v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant.


DECISION OF DISMISSAL

ALLISON R. BOOMER MAGISTRATE, JUDGE.

This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.

A case management conference was scheduled at 10:00 a.m. on June 3, 2013, to consider Plaintiffs' appeal. On May 15, 2013, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to Plaintiffs at the address Plaintiffs provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. The notice advised that if Plaintiffs did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal.

On June 3, 2013, the court sent Plaintiffs a letter which explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The letter advised that if Plaintiffs did not provide a written explanation by June 18, 2013, for their failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiffs have not submitted a written response to the court explaining their failure to appear at the June 3, 2013, case management conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.


Summaries of

Bertrand v. Lane County Assessor

Tax Court of Oregon
Jun 24, 2013
TC-MD 130131N (Or. T.C. Jun. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Bertrand v. Lane County Assessor

Case Details

Full title:ANAHID BERTRAND and ERIC ANDRE PAUL BERTRAND, Plaintiffs v. LANE COUNTY…

Court:Tax Court of Oregon

Date published: Jun 24, 2013

Citations

TC-MD 130131N (Or. T.C. Jun. 24, 2013)