From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bertram v. Sizelove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2013
1:10cv00583 AWI DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)

Opinion

1:10cv00583 AWI DLB PC

04-02-2013

TIMOTHY BERTRAM, Plaintiff, v. C. SIZELOVE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DEFENDANT' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


(Document 101)

Plaintiff Timothy Bertram ("Plaintiff") is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed on April 5, 2010.

In the interests of justice, the Court finds it necessary to VACATE the October 22, 2012, Findings and Recommendations regarding Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54(b). The parties need not submit additional briefing and the motion is deemed submitted pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bertram v. Sizelove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2013
1:10cv00583 AWI DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Bertram v. Sizelove

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY BERTRAM, Plaintiff, v. C. SIZELOVE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

1:10cv00583 AWI DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)