From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bertlin v. Seterus, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 29, 2018
No. 1:17-cv-00811-CL (D. Or. Mar. 29, 2018)

Opinion

No. 1:17-cv-00811-CL

03-29-2018

Kathryn M. Bertlin, Plaintiff, v. Seterus, Inc., Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 15, and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although the parties filed no objections, I have reviewed the legal principles de novo. See United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude that the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke's R&R is adopted in full. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is therefore GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 29th day of March, 2018.

/s/ Michael McShane

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bertlin v. Seterus, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 29, 2018
No. 1:17-cv-00811-CL (D. Or. Mar. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Bertlin v. Seterus, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Kathryn M. Bertlin, Plaintiff, v. Seterus, Inc., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 29, 2018

Citations

No. 1:17-cv-00811-CL (D. Or. Mar. 29, 2018)