From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bertin v. Bertin

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 50855 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Opinion

2004-820 P C.

Decided June 1, 2005.

Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the Justice Court, Town of Carmel, Putnam County (J. Spofford Jr., J.), entered August 23, 2004, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and matter remanded to the court below for a new trial.

Before: PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and COVELLO, JJ.


Substantial justice was not done between the parties in this action for destruction of property (UJCA 1804, 1807). The judgment in favor of the defendant is not supported by the scanty record, and the Justice's minutes are not sufficiently descriptive of the testimony to permit a meaningful appellate review of issues of liability and damages ( see UJCA 1704; Kappus v. Zimbaldi, NYLJ, May 30, 2001 [App Term, 9th 10th Jud Dists]). The matter is accordingly remanded to the court below for a fuller development of the facts, including, but not limited to, defendant's authority to remove plaintiff's possessions from the premises, plaintiff's entitlement to use and occupancy of the premises, and the value of plaintiff's property allegedly removed and disposed of.


Summaries of

Bertin v. Bertin

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 50855 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Case details for

Bertin v. Bertin

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL BERTIN, Appellant, v. PAOLO BERTIN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 2005

Citations

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 50855 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)