From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Feb 2, 2006
Case No. 3:00CV327 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:00CV327.

February 2, 2006


ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY


The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 90 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Berry v. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Feb 2, 2006
Case No. 3:00CV327 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Berry v. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JACK BEERY, Plaintiff, v. THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC. Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Feb 2, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:00CV327 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2006)