From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 24, 1989
547 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

finding that the court can not impose a greater sentence once the defendant starts to serve an original sentence

Summary of this case from Trotter v. State

Opinion

Nos. 88-2715, 88-2716, 88-2717.

August 24, 1989.

Petition from the Circuit Court, Calhoun County, Robert L. McCrary, Jr., J.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender; David P. Gauldin, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


The defendants in these consolidated cases appeal from an order of the trial court vacating and setting aside, on the state's motion, the defendants' negotiated guilty pleas and sentences on the grounds that the prosecutor and the trial court mistakenly believed at the time of sentencing that the guidelines scoresheet was accurate when in fact, upon discovery of the failure to score certain offenses, it was realized that the applicable guidelines range should have been greater. In addition to vacating the sentences and guilty pleas, the order further provided that the defendants stand trial on the subject charges. We treat the defendants' consolidated appeals as petitions for certiorari and grant the same. See Jackson v. State, 527 So.2d 845 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

The resolution of this case is controlled by the line of cases exemplified by Doe v. State, 492 So.2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (even where the original sentence was a result of misrepresentation by the defendant — not involved in the instant case — trial court may not impose a greater sentence once defendant starts to serve original sentence). The subject order is no less erroneous because a greater sentence has not yet been imposed. The order is clearly erroneous and meets the criteria for relief via the remedy of certiorari. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250, 254 (Fla. 1988).

Certiorari granted, and cause remanded to trial court with directions to vacate the subject order and reinstate the judgments and sentences.

THOMPSON, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 24, 1989
547 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

finding that the court can not impose a greater sentence once the defendant starts to serve an original sentence

Summary of this case from Trotter v. State
Case details for

Berry v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN JOSEPH BERRY, BILLY RAY WOOD AND WALTER WAYNE McMILLIAN, APPELLANTS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 24, 1989

Citations

547 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Trotter v. State

However, in no event can the trial court increase the sentence beyond the original 83.2 month sentence…

Navarrete v. State

Double jeopardy precludes a court from resentencing a defendant to a greater term because of its own…