From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Peuter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 15, 1924
223 P. 617 (Okla. 1924)

Opinion

No. 12211

Opinion Filed January 15, 1924. Rehearing Denied March 4, 1924.

Appeal and Error — Case-Made — Extension of Time — Invalidity.

An order extending time to make and serve case-made after expiration of the time given in a former order is void, and a case-made served, settled, and signed thereafter is a nullity; and in such case, where the questions presented in plaintiff in error's brief cannot be reviewed upon the transcript, the judgment will be affirmed.

(Syllabus by Ray, C.)

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 1

Error from District Court, Payne County; Arthur R. Swank, Judge.

Action by R.E. Peuter against W.M. Berry, doing business as the Oil Field Junk Supply Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Thompson, Wilson Thompson, J.M. Springer, and Aaron Selig Barry, for plaintiff in error.

Henry Oursler, for defendant in error.


This record, as a case-made, is a nullity, but is certified as a transcript. At the time the motion for a new trial was overruled the defendant was given 60 days to make and serve case-made. December 9, 1920, the time was again extended in these words:

"* * * The defendant be and he is hereby granted extension of 60 days from the date thereof within which to make and serve a case-made. * * *"

February 14, 1921, another extension was granted in which time the case-made was settled and signed. The extension of February 14, 1921, was granted after the time allowed in the previous extension had expired and was therefore void. Cook v. Cook, 79 Okla. 222, 192 P. 215, and cases there cited.

The only question argued by plaintiff in error which could be brought here by transcript is that of demurrer to plaintiff's petition. The transcript does not include such demurrer and does not show that any demurrer was ever filed or considered by the court.

The judgment is affirmed; and, on request contained in defendant in error's brief, judgment will be entered in this court against Adolph Frankel, as surety on the supersedeas bond, for $2,124.69, with interest thereon at six per cent. from the 23rd day of October, 1920.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Berry v. Peuter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 15, 1924
223 P. 617 (Okla. 1924)
Case details for

Berry v. Peuter

Case Details

Full title:BERRY v. PEUTER

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 15, 1924

Citations

223 P. 617 (Okla. 1924)
223 P. 617

Citing Cases

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Mills

"Where the time fixed for making and serving a case-made is allowed to lapse, the trial court thus loses…

Okmulgee Securities Co. v. Osage Oil Refining Co.

On August 11, 1921, the court granted the plaintiff an additional 30 days, and the time so granted expired on…