From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 5, 2012
CA 11-0618-KD-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CA 11-0618-KD-C

04-05-2012

ROBERT F. BERRY and BEVERLY BERRY, Plaintiffs, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., etc., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated March 15, 2012 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' motion to remand is DENIED.

_________

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Berry v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 5, 2012
CA 11-0618-KD-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Berry v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT F. BERRY and BEVERLY BERRY, Plaintiffs, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 5, 2012

Citations

CA 11-0618-KD-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 5, 2012)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

(Doc. 1, n. 1) Second, CitiMortgage argues that although Jackson did not specify an amount of damages in the…