From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Johnson Johnson

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 12, 2010
Civil No. 09-3626 (JRT) (D. Minn. Nov. 12, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-3626 (JRT).

November 12, 2010

Edward Coleman, Lewis J. Saul, and Kevin M. Fitzgerald, LEWIS SAUL ASSOCIATES, PC, Portland, ME; Ronald S. Goldser and Stacy Hauer, ZIMMERMAN REED, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiff.

William Robinson, LECLAIR RYAN, Alexandria, VA; John Dames, DRINKER, BIDDLE AND REATH, Chicago, IL; Dana Lenahah, Jane McLean Bernier, and Tracy Van Steenburgh, NILAN JOHNSON LEWIS, Minneapolis, MN, for defendants.


ORDER


Pursuant to the stipulation of dismissal with prejudice executed by the parties, through their respective counsel and filed on October 29, 2010 [Docket No. 13],

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiff JOYCE BERRY, individually, against all named Defendants are DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE, and without costs to either party.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED.

Dated: November 10, 2010

at Minneapolis, Minnesota


Summaries of

Berry v. Johnson Johnson

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 12, 2010
Civil No. 09-3626 (JRT) (D. Minn. Nov. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Berry v. Johnson Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JOYCE BERRY, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON JOHNSON, ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 12, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-3626 (JRT) (D. Minn. Nov. 12, 2010)