From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. Boulware

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: It is settled law that a party who has failed or refused to perform his contractual obligations is not entitled to specific performance of that contract (see, Grace v Nappa, 46 N.Y.2d 560, 567, rearg denied 47 N.Y.2d 952; Panner Woodworking Co. v Adair, 75 A.D.2d 553, 554; see generally, 96 N.Y. Jur 2d, Specific Performance, §§ 23, 24). It is uncontroverted that plaintiff defaulted on his obligation to purchase defendants' shares of stock and that he also failed to perform the directives of a prior court order concerning the purchase or sale of stock in defendant corporation. Under the circumstances, plaintiff was not entitled to specific performance of the settlement agreement.


Summaries of

Berry v. Boulware

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Berry v. Boulware

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY A. BERRY, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Shareholders of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 1134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Zelmanovitch v. Ramos

However, the plaintiff failed to attend the closing, despite claiming that he was ready, willing, and able to…