Opinion
No. 2019-829 Q C
06-17-2022
Shahin Beroukhim, Appellant, v. Hertz Rent A Car, Respondent.
Shahin Beroukhim, appellant pro se. Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, LLC (Joseph De Donato of counsel), for respondent.
Unpublished Opinion
Shahin Beroukhim, appellant pro se.
Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, LLC (Joseph De Donato of counsel), for respondent.
PRESENT: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Phillip Hom, J.), entered November 13, 2018. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the principal sum of $5,000 for damage to his vehicle resulting from an accident with a vehicle owned by defendant and operated by defendant's employee, Amira Hassan. At a nonjury trial, plaintiff testified that he was stopped at a traffic light when defendant's vehicle struck his vehicle. Hassan testified that plaintiff turned his vehicle to the right and collided with defendant's vehicle that was proceeding straight. The police report, which was admitted into evidence, revealed that plaintiff told the reporting officer that he was attempting to turn onto West 37th Street from lane #2. Following the trial, the Civil Court dismissed the action.
In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has... been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; see CCA 1804; Ross v Friedman, 269 A.D.2d 584 [2000]; Williams v Roper, 269 A.D.2d 125 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (see Vizzari v State of New York, 184 A.D.2d 564 [1992]; Kincade v Kincade, 178 A.D.2d 510 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (see Williams v Roper, 269 A.D.2d at 126).
Here, the court found that Hassan had provided credible testimony that it was plaintiff's negligence which had caused the accident. As there is no basis in the record to disturb the court's credibility determination, we find that the judgment in favor of defendant rendered substantial justice between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (see CCA 1804, 1807).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.