From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstock v. Paramount Beauty Shoppe, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1939
257 App. Div. 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

June 30, 1939.


Action brought by the plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries sustained because of the alleged negligence of defendant Rap-I-Dol Distributing Corp., and by the plaintiff husband to recover damages for loss of his wife's services. Plaintiffs appeal from an order setting aside a ruling theretofore made upon an examination before trial of the corporate defendant Rap-I-Dol Distributing Corp. upon the ground that the question propounded is not within the purview of any of the items contained in the order for the examination before trial, and directing that the objection to such question by the defendant's attorney be sustained and that the witness be not compelled to answer. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the order is not appealable. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bernstock v. Paramount Beauty Shoppe, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1939
257 App. Div. 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Bernstock v. Paramount Beauty Shoppe, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAE BERNSTOCK and HARRY BERNSTOCK, Appellants, v. PARAMOUNT BEAUTY SHOPPE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Oppenheimer v. Duophoto Corporation

Neither an examination nor a trial is to be interrupted or this court burdened with what would undoubtedly…

Matter of Jackson v. B.L.T. Garment Co., Inc.

Appeal by a third party from an order, made in the course of the examination of such third party in…