From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstein v. Red Apple Supermarkets

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1997
89 N.Y.2d 961 (N.Y. 1997)

Opinion

Submitted December 2, 1996

Decided February 11, 1997


Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 21, 1996 Appellate Division order, dismissed as untimely upon the ground that the prior motion for leave to appeal from the May 21, 1996 order, made to the Appellate Division, was untimely ( see, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 101, at 429); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.


Summaries of

Bernstein v. Red Apple Supermarkets

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1997
89 N.Y.2d 961 (N.Y. 1997)
Case details for

Bernstein v. Red Apple Supermarkets

Case Details

Full title:ETHEL BERNSTEIN et al., Respondents, v. RED APPLE SUPERMARKETS, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 11, 1997

Citations

89 N.Y.2d 961 (N.Y. 1997)
642 N.Y.S.2d 303
678 N.E.2d 493

Citing Cases

Wagner v. Grinnell Housing Dev. Fund Corp.

Therefore, Grinnell's notice of cross-appeal was timely, insofar as it was served within five days of…

SUTHERLAND v. DON DEE TRUCKING CORP.

Discussion To set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, the court must determine "whether…