From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstein v. Goldsticker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

May, 1919.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Putnam, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ.


The jurisdiction to require defendant to convey in fee for the consideration agreed, less an abatement for the calculated value of the dower right, is now settled. ( Bostwick v. Beach, 103 N.Y. 414; Maas v. Morgenthaler, 136 App. Div. 359.) Having taken jurisdiction to enforce plaintiff's lien as vendee for payment of part purchase money, the equity court could go on and decree money damages as an alternative to taking such a deed from the husband only, with such dower right outstanding. The judgment is, therefore, unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Bernstein v. Goldsticker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Bernstein v. Goldsticker

Case Details

Full title:MAX BERNSTEIN, Respondent, v. SAMUEL GOLDSTICKER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1919

Citations

188 App. Div. 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)