From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berning v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 3, 2020
594 S.W.3d 245 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 82375

03-03-2020

Trina L. BERNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.


S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Trina Berning appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion after evidentiary hearing. She claims in one point on appeal that her counsel was ineffective in advising her to not confess her guilt during sentencing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Berning v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 3, 2020
594 S.W.3d 245 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Berning v. State

Case Details

Full title:Trina L. BERNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 3, 2020

Citations

594 S.W.3d 245 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)