From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernier v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division
Oct 12, 2005
Civil Action No. 3:05CV00011 (W.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:05CV00011.

October 12, 2005


ORDER


Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of July 15, 2005 on the Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). The Report also addresses the Plaintiffs' verbal motion to voluntarily dismiss Count Four of their complaint. The Magistrate's Report recommends that this Court deny the Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, deny the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, grant the Plaintiffs' verbal motion to voluntarily dismiss Count Four, and dismiss Count Four. On July 25, 2005, the Defendant filed timely objections to the Report's recommendation that its Motion to Dismiss be denied. This Court has performed a de novo review of the portions of the Magistrate's Report to which the Defendant has objected. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (West 1993 and Supp. 2000); FED.R.CIV.P. 72(b).

Having thoroughly considered the entire case, all relevant law, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby

ADJUDGED ORDERED AND DECREED

as follows:

1. The Magistrate's Report and Recommendation of July 15, 2005 shall be, and it hereby is, ACCEPTED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART;

2. The Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, filed April 1, 2005, shall be, and it hereby is, DENIED;

3. The Plaintiff's verbal motion to dismiss Count Four of the complaint shall be, and it hereby is, GRANTED;

4. Count Four of the complaint shall be, and it hereby is, DISMISSED;

5. The Defendant's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are SUSTAINED;

6. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed March 2, 2005, shall be, and it hereby is GRANTED as to Counts One through Three;

7. This action shall be, and it hereby is, DISMISSED. This dismissal is without prejudice with respect to the Plaintiffs' alternative claim for damages in Count One;

8. This action shall be, and it hereby is, STRICKEN from the docket of this Court.

The Clerk of the Court hereby is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to Magistrate Judge Crigler.


Summaries of

Bernier v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division
Oct 12, 2005
Civil Action No. 3:05CV00011 (W.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2005)
Case details for

Bernier v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BERNIER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division

Date published: Oct 12, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:05CV00011 (W.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2005)

Citing Cases

Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Ott

To the extent an argument can be made that Columbia is also a citizen of West Virginia, this will not disturb…

Raaum Estates v. Murex Petroleum Corp.

The cases, however, are inapposite in that the facilities at issue in those cases were clearly within the…