From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernal v. Wade

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1873
46 Cal. 640 (Cal. 1873)

Opinion

         Application to recall remittitur, and to be allowed to file a petition for a rehearing.

         The appeal, which was from a judgment rendered in the District Court of the Third Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco, was decided October 14th, 1873.

         COUNSEL:

         T. H. Laine, for Appellants, moved, upon an affidavit showing the facts stated by the Court, that the remittitur be recalled and the petition filed.


         OPINION          By the Court:

         The time to file the petition for a rehearing expired on November eighth. The petition was placed in the express office at San Jose for transmission to the Clerk of this Court, and should have reached him in time to be filed, but it was not, in fact, received until the tenth of November, when the remittitur had been sent to the Court below. The case is not distinguishable from that of Hanson v. McCue , 43 Cal. 178, and the remittitur must, therefore, be recalled and the petition for a rehearing placed on file.

         So ordered.


Summaries of

Bernal v. Wade

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1873
46 Cal. 640 (Cal. 1873)
Case details for

Bernal v. Wade

Case Details

Full title:BERNAL v. WADE

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1873

Citations

46 Cal. 640 (Cal. 1873)

Citing Cases

Trumpler v. Trumpler

This must be so, or intolerable injuries might result." The same rule has been declared in Hanson v. McCue ,…

Isenberg v. Sherman

In contemplation of law, an order obtained upon a false suggestion is not the order of the court, and may be…