March 9, 1938.
Present — Sears, P.J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The order is affirmed because the evidence discloses no property of the defendant subject to receivership. All concur. (The order denies a motion by the judgment creditor for the appointment of a receiver for the property of the judgment debtor.)
Full title:In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: MIRIAM H. BERMAN, Judgment…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Mar 9, 1938
The remedy will be denied where there is no property of the judgment debtor which is properly amenable to a…
Gantz v. T.R.C. Holding Corp.The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's application for the appointment of a receiver for the…