From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 8, 1914
44 Okla. 436 (Okla. 1914)

Opinion

No. 3879

Opinion Filed December 8, 1914.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Decisions Appealable — Order Vacating Judgment — "Final Orders." An order vacating a judgment under sections 4464 and 4465, St Okla. 1893 (sections 5267 and 5268, Rev. Laws 1910), is not "final," and no appeal therefrom is authorized by sections 4434 and 4436, St. Okla. 1893 (sections 5235 and 5236, Rev. Laws 1910).

(Syllabus by Thacker, C.)

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. de Graffenried, Judge.

Action by the Berger Manufacturing Company, a corporation, against School District No. 10 of Muskogee County and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed.

John H. Mosier, for plaintiff in error.

J. W. Brady, for defendants in error.


An order vacating a judgment as authorized by section 4464, St. Okla. 1893 (section 5267, Rev. Laws 1910), upon procedure prescribed by section 4465, St. Okla. 1893 (section 5268, Rev. Laws 1910), is not a final order Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 24 Okla. 299, 103 P. 1038; Moody Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co. et al., 29 Okla. 390, 118 P. 135; Smith v. Whitlow et al., 31 Okla. 758, 123 P. 1061; Langston v. Thigpen, 33 Okla. 605, 127 P. 258), within the meaning of sections 4434 and 4436, St. Okla. 1893 (sections 5235 and 5236, Rev. Laws 1910); and upon the authority of the above-cited cases this appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 8, 1914
44 Okla. 436 (Okla. 1914)
Case details for

Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.

Case Details

Full title:BERGER MFG. CO. v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 10 OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 8, 1914

Citations

44 Okla. 436 (Okla. 1914)
144 P. 1023

Citing Cases

Laramour v. Campbell

This contention must be sustained. It is well settled in this jurisdiction that an order vacating and setting…