From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berg v. Aetna Freight Lines

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 19, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-1393 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-1393.

August 19, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On March 11, 2008, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On July 17, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. 7). The Magistrate Judge recommended that the District Court deny this Motion. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties. On August 4, 2008, the Defendants filed Objections (Doc. 22) to the Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 23) was filed on August 14, 2008.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following ORDER is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. 7) is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay dated July 17, 2008 (Doc. 21) is hereby adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Berg v. Aetna Freight Lines

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 19, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-1393 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Berg v. Aetna Freight Lines

Case Details

Full title:KIRSTEN BERG, Plaintiff v. AETNA FREIGHT LINES; TRANSPORTATION…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 19, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-1393 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Coe v. Northern Pipe Products, Inc.

Coe argues that the "protected activity" establishing the first element of her retaliation claim, see id.,…