From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beom Su Lee v. TV Chosun Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 3, 2022
CV 22-933-DSF-KS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-933-DSF-KS

06-03-2022

BEOM SU LEE, Plaintiff, v. TV CHOSUN CORP., et al., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

DALE S. FISCHER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to serve process on the defendants within 90 days of the filing of the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The Court may extend this deadline for good cause. Id. More than 90 days have passed since the complaint in this case was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service as to defendants Soribada Corp., Chung Eui Song TV, and Simple Enter. Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause no later than June 17, 2022 why the unserved defendants should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of proof(s) of service showing that the relevant defendants were served within the 90-day period or a showing of good cause for extending the service period constitute adequate responses to this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Beom Su Lee v. TV Chosun Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 3, 2022
CV 22-933-DSF-KS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Beom Su Lee v. TV Chosun Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BEOM SU LEE, Plaintiff, v. TV CHOSUN CORP., et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

CV 22-933-DSF-KS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2022)