Opinion
2:23-cv-51
07-10-2023
MICHAEL BENTLEY, III, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE, Defendant.
CYNTHIA R. WYRICK, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ORDER
TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Wyrick's report and recommendation that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice (Doc. 9).
Plaintiff filed this action pro se and moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 4.) Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, district courts must screen pro se complaints-even when the plaintiff is not a prisoner but seeks in forma pauperis status-and sua sponte dismiss any claims that are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or name a defendant who is immune. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); Baker v. Wayne Cnty. Fam. Indep. Agency, 75 Fed.Appx. 501, 502 (6th Cir. 2003) (“The statute requires courts to dismiss in forma pauperis complaints that fail to state a claim[] and applies to complaints filed by nonprisoners as well as prisoners.” (citations omitted)). Therefore, Magistrate Judge Wyrick screened Plaintiff's complaint prior to considering his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 9.) Magistrate Judge Wyrick entered a report and recommendation, recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the report and recommendation, and his time to do so has passed.
After reviewing the record and the applicable law, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the report and recommendation (Doc. 9) and ORDERS that all Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT WILL ENTER.