From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bentanco v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jul 18, 2001
Civ. No. 01-23 LFG/WWD (D.N.M. Jul. 18, 2001)

Opinion

Civ. No. 01-23 LFG/WWD

July 18, 2001


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion to Compel and Request for Sanctions filed July 12, 2001 (Docket #30). The motion seeks an order directing Defendant (Wal-Mart) to give full and complete answers to Interrogatories 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 11; and to produce the documents sought in Requests for Production 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10.

Wal-Mart has made objections to Interrogatories# 1, 2, 4, and 6, which are well taken and no further response to those interrogatories will be required. No further response will be required to Interrogatory # 10 or 11.

Wal-Mart has made objection to Requests for Production # 1 through 7; however, notwithstanding the objections, Wal-Mart has responded with some document production in connection with some of those requests.

Request for Production # 1.

Wal-Marts objection as to other stores is well taken. Wal-Mart shall produce all the material sought in connection with the Carlisle Store.

Request for Production # 2.

Wal-Mart shall produce all the material sought in connection with the Carlisle Store.

Request for Production # 3, 4, 5, and 6.

Wal-Marts objections to these requests are sustained.

Request for Production # 7.

Wal-Mart shall produce all the material sought in connection with this Request for Production.

Request for Production # 8.

All documents held by or under the control of Wal-Mart which deal with Employers Protective Services dealings with Wal-Mart in New Mexico shall be produced to Plaintiffs.

Request for Production # 10.

Wal-Marts objection to this request is sustained, conditioned upon Wal-Marts making the production alluded to in its Response to the Request for Production.

Production ordered above shall be made by Wal-Mart on or before August 1, 2001 . No sanctions will be imposed in connection with this motion. Discovery shall proceed in accordance with the foregoing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bentanco v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jul 18, 2001
Civ. No. 01-23 LFG/WWD (D.N.M. Jul. 18, 2001)
Case details for

Bentanco v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BERTHA BENTANCO, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Jul 18, 2001

Citations

Civ. No. 01-23 LFG/WWD (D.N.M. Jul. 18, 2001)