From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benshoof v. City of Shoreline

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 30, 2024
No. C24-0343-TL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 30, 2024)

Opinion

C24-0343-TL

04-30-2024

KURT A. BENSHOOF, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SHORELINE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION

S. KATE VAUGHAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Because Plaintiff Kurt Benshoof does not appear to have funds available to afford the $405 filing fee, Plaintiff financially qualifies for in forma pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff Kurt Benshoof's IFP application, see Dkts. 6, 10 & 12, is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to the assigned District Judge.


Summaries of

Benshoof v. City of Shoreline

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 30, 2024
No. C24-0343-TL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Benshoof v. City of Shoreline

Case Details

Full title:KURT A. BENSHOOF, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SHORELINE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Apr 30, 2024

Citations

No. C24-0343-TL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 30, 2024)